Is it true that non-relevant data includes Apple, Android, and Windows?

The statement regarding non-relevant data including Apple, Android, and Windows is not accurate when considered in the context of digital forensics. Non-relevant data is generally defined as information that does not pertain to the subject of an investigation or is not needed to support case objectives. This determination is case-specific and depends on the circumstances of the investigation, including the type of evidence required and the relevance of the data being analyzed.

In a forensic investigation, data from Apple, Android, and Windows devices can potentially be relevant, depending on the context of the case. For example, if a case involves communications or transactions conducted on a particular platform, data from that platform would be pertinent, thus making it relevant rather than non-relevant. Consequently, answering true to the assertion overlooks the nuanced nature of relevance in forensic investigations.

Ultimately, the correct interpretation of relevance drives the conclusion that non-relevant data is not confined to specific operating systems or devices but is determined by its applicability to a given case. Thus, the appropriate response would be that relevance depends on the specifics of the investigation, which aligns with the idea that the relevance of any data must be assessed on a case-by-case basis.